Início » Referências bibliográficas

Referências bibliográficas

  1. Abou-Setta AM, Al-Inany HG, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Aboulghar MA. Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3114-21.
  2. Abou-Setta AM, Mansour RT, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI. Amongwomenundergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birthimproved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemicreview and meta-analysis of prospectiverandomizedtrials. Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):333-41.
  3. Abou-SettaAM. What is the best site for embryo deposition? A systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(5):611-9.
  4. Coroleu B, Barri PN, Carreras O, et al. Hum Reprod. 2002 Feb;17(2):341-6;
  5. Abou-Setta. Effect of passive uterine straightening during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(5):516-22.
  6. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update. 2003 MayJun;9(3):275-89.
  7. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, Artzi S, Gross M, Barak Y. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril. 2003 Dec;80(6):1413-9.
  8. Bergh T, Lundkvist O. Clinical complications during in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 1992 May;7(5):625-6. Referências bibliográficas
  9. Brown J, Buckingham K, Abou-Setta AM, BuckettW. Ultrasound versus ’clinical touch’ for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD006107.
  10. Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003 Oct;80(4):1037-41.
  11. Buckett WM. A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):728-34.
  12. Derks RS, Farquhar C, Mol BW, Buckingham K, Heineman MJ. Techniques for preparation prior to embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007682.
  13. Devroey P. GnRH antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):15-7.
  14. Felberbaum RE, Albano C, Ludwig M, et al. Ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction with HMG and concomitant midcycle administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix according to the multiple dose protocol: a prospective uncontrolled phase III study. Hum Reprod. 2000 May;15(5):1015-20.
  15. Fluker M, Grifo J, Leader A, et al. Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. FertilSteril. 2001 Jan;75(1):38-45.
  16. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:11;7:CD002118.
  17. Guzick DS, Overstreet JW, Factor-Litvak P, et al. Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1388-93.
  18. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):330-53.
  19. Hershlag A , Paine T , Kvapil G , Feng H , Napolitano B. In vitro fertilization – intracytoplasmic sperm injection split (an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure). Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):229–232.
  20. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL, et al. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jul;20(4):530-41.
  21. Lan VT, Tuan PH, Canh LT, Tuong HM, Howles CM. Progesterone supplementation during cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles: efficacy and convenience of two vaginal formulations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Sep;17(3):318–23.
  22. Li LL, Zhou J, Qian XJ, Chen YD. Meta-analysis on the possible association between in vitro fertilization and cancer risk. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jan;23(1):16-24.
  23. Liu DY, Baker HWG. Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI. Asian J Androl. 2002 Dec;4(4):281-5.
  24. Ludwig M, Diedrich K. Evaluation of an optimal luteal phase support protocol in IVF. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 May;80(5):452-66.
  25. Ludwig M, Schwartz P, Babahan B, et al. Luteal phase support using either Crinone 8% or Utrogest: results of a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Jun 10;103(1):48-52.
  26. Majumdar G, Majumdar A. A prospective randomized study to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid sperm selection on the intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of patients with unexplained infertility having normal semen parameters. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013 Nov;30(11):1471-5.
  27. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Murphy KE, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):138-48.
  28. McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1514-20.
  29. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetricand perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):485-503.
  30. Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S, et al. Comparison of two ready-touse systems designed for sperm-hyaluronic acid binding selection before intracytoplasmic sperm injection: PICSI vs. Sperm Slow: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2012 Sep;98(3):632-7.
  31. Polyzos NP, Messini CI, Papanikolaou EG, et al. Vaginal progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2083-7.
  32. Reissmann T1, Schally AV, Bouchard P, Riethmiiller H, Engel J. The LHRH antagonistcetrorelix: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Jul-Aug;6(4):322-31.
  33. Sallam HN, Sadek SS. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2003 Oct;80(4):1042-6;

34.Santibañez A, García J, Pashkova O, et al. Effect of intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy rates from in vitro fertilisation cycles: a prospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Jan 29;12:9.

  1. Sergentanis TN, Diamantaras AA, Perlepe C, Kanavidis P, Skalkidou A, Petridou ET. IVF and breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):106-23.
  2. Serhal PF, Ranieri DM, Kinis A, Marchant S, Davies M, Kadum IM. Oocyte morphology predicts outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 1997 Jun;12(6):1267-70.
  3. Setti AS, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, Iaconelli A Jr, Aoki T, Borges E Jr. Twelve years of MSOME and IMSI: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Oct;27(4):338-52.
  4. Simunic V, Tomic V, Tomic J, Nizic D. Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan capsules, used for luteal support. Fertil Steril 2007 Jan;87(1):83–7.
  5. Siristatidis C, Sergentanis TN, Kanavidis P, et al. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF: impact on ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer- -a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 MarApr;19(2):105-23.

40.Terriou P, Sapin C, Giorgetti C, Hans E, Spach JL, Roulier R. Embryo score is a better predictor of pregnancy than the number of transferred embryos or female age. Fertil Steril. 2001 Mar;75(3):525-31.

  1. The European Orgalutran Study Group. Borm G, Mannaerts B. Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentretrial. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1490-8.
  2. Tiras B, Polat M, Korucuoglu U, Zeyneloglu HB, Yarali H. Impact of embryo replacement depth on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1341-5.
  3. van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD009154.

44.Zarutskie PW, Phillips JA. A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):163–9.

Valores e Dúvidas sobre os
Tratamentos
Tire suas dúvida e saibas os valores dos nossos tratamentos