Início » REFERÊNCIAS

REFERÊNCIAS

  1. Acien P. Reproductive performance of women with uterine malformations. Hum. Reprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):122-6.
  2. Acien P. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:1372–1375.
  3. Airoldi J, Berghella V, Sehdev H, Ludmir J. Transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix to predict preterm birth in women with uterine anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(3):553-6.
  4. Alborzi S, Asadi N, Zolghadri J, Alborzi S, Alborzi M. Laparoscopic metroplasty in bicornuate and didelphic uteri. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):352-5.
  5. American Fertility Society. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion secondary to to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil. Steril. 1988;49:944–955.
  6. Aubriot FX, Chapron C. [Diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero. Polemics about metroplasty. The pros]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007;35(9):826-31.
  7. Bagnoli VR, Fonseca AM, Arie WMY, Gomes CM, Bagnoli F. Malformações genitais na adolescência – potencial reprodutor e assistência pré-natal. In: Monteiro DLM, Trajano AJB, Bastos AC (Orgs.) Gravidez e adolescência. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter; 2009. p. 246-53.
  8. Barranger E, Gervaise A, Doumerc S, Fernandez H. Reproductive performance after hysteroscopic metroplasty in the hypoplastic uterus: a study of 29 cases. BJOG. 2002;109(12):1331-4.
  9. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE. Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (ananalysis of 144 cases). Fertil. Steril. 1979;32:40–46.
  10. Donnez J, Nisolle M. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? Endoscopic laser treatment of uterine malformations. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:1381–1388.
  11. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini, M. Franchi D, Tozzi L, Dorta M. Ultrastructural aspects of endometrium in infertile women with septate uterus. Fertil. Steril. 1996;65:886–890.
  12. Ferreira AC, Mauad-Filho F, Nicolau LG, Gallarreta FMP, Paula WM, Gomes DC. Ultra-sonografia tridimensional em ginecologia: malformações uterinas. Radiol Bras. 2007;40(2):131-6.
  13. Golan A, Langer R., Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Congenital anomalies of the Müllerian system. Fertil. Steril. 1989;51:747–755.
  14. Green LK, Harris RE. Uterine anomalies. Frequency of diagnosis and associated obstetric complication. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996;47;427–729.
  15. Harger JH, Archer DF, Marchese SG, Muracca-Clemens M, Garver K L. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy losses and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol. 1983;62:574–581.
  16. Heinonen PK, Pystynen PP. Primary infertility and uterine anomalies. Fertil. Steril. 1983;40:311–317.
  17. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P. Reproductive performance of woman with uterine anomalies. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1982;61:157–162.
  18. Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt LH, Edmonds DK. Psychological distress in women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome, MRKH). Psychosomatics. 2009;50(3):277-81.
  19. Heller-Boersma JG, Schmidt UH, Edmonds DK. A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention versus waiting-list control for women with uterovaginal agenesis (Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: MRKH). Hum Reprod. 2007;22(8):2296-301.
  20. Jacobsen IJ,De Cherney A. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? Results of conventional and hysteroscopic surgery. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:1376–1380.
  21. Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, Grover S. The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1456-67.
  22. Jeffcoate N. Anomalias e deformações do aparelho genital. In: Jeffcoate N. Princípios de Ginecologia. 4ª ed. São Paulo: Manole; 1979. p. 163-87.
  23. Kannaiyan L, Chacko J, George A, Sen S. Colon replacement of vagina to restore menstrual function in 11 adolescent girls with vaginal or cervicovaginal agenesis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25(8):675-81.
  24. Lolis DE, Paschopoulos M, Makrydimas G, Zikopoulos K, Sotiriadis A, Paraskevaidis E. Reproductive outcome after strassmann metroplasty in women with a bicornuate uterus. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(5):297-301.
  25. Ludmir J, Samuels P, Brooks S, Mennuti T. Pregnancy outcome of patients with uncorrected uterine anomalies managed in a high-risk obstetric setting. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990;75:906–910.
  26. Marcus S, Al-Shawaf T, Brinsden P. The obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women with congenital uterine malformations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996;75:85–89.
  27. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med. 1998;43(10):877-87.
  28. Nickerson CW. Infertility and uterine contour. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997;129:268–271.
  29. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S, Strissel PL, Strick R, Oppelt PG, et al. The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1493-7.
  30. Papp Z, Mezei G, Gávai M, Hupuczi P, Urbancsek J. Reproductive performance after transabdominal metroplasty: a review of 157 consecutive cases. J Reprod Med. 2006;51(7):544-52.
  31. Patton PE, Novy MJ. Reproductive potential of the anomalous uterus. Semin. Reprod. Endocrinol. 1988;6:217–220.
  32. Pellicer A. Shall we operate on Müllerian defects? A introduction to the debate. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:1371–1372.
  33. Pelosi III MA, Pelosi MA. Laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal metroplasty for the treatment of the bicornuate uterus: a case study. Fertil. Steril. 1996;65:886–890.
  34. Raga F, Bonilla-Musoles F, Blanes J, Osborne NG. Congenital Müllerian anomalies: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertil. Steril. 1996;65:523–528.
  35. Rechberger T, Monist M, Bartuzi A. Clinical effectiveness of Strassman operation in the treatment of bicornuate uterus. Ginekol Pol. 2009;80(2):88-92.
  36. Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(5):1886-94.
  37. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415-29.
  38. Seidman DS, Ben-Rafael Z, Bider D, Recabi K, Mashiach S. The role of cervical cerclage in the management of uterine anomalies. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;173(5):384-6.
  39. Shirota K, Fukuoka M, Tsujioka H, Inoue Y, Kawarabayashi T. A normal uterus communicating with a double cervix and the vagina: a müllerian anomaly without any present classificarion. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(3):935.e1-3.
  40. Simón C, Martinez L, Pardo P, Tortajada M, Pellicer A. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil. Steril. 1991 Dec;56(6):1192-3.
  41. Sinha R, Mahajan C, Hegde A, Shukla A. Laparoscopic metroplasty for bicornuate uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13(1):70-3.
  42. Spitzer RF, Kives S, Allen LM. Case series of laparoscopically resected noncommunicating functional uterine horns. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22(1):e23-8.
  43. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology. 2004;233(1):19- 34.
  44. Woodring TC, Klauser CK, Cromartie DA, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. When is a cerclage indicated for cervical insufficiency? A literature review. J Miss State Med Assoc. 2006;47(9):264-6.
Valores e Dúvidas sobre os
Tratamentos
Tire suas dúvida e saibas os valores dos nossos tratamentos